Updated: September 10, 2010
 
Options

Lancet

 
Advanced

 
 
Lancet
New study assesses survival in T2DM as a function of A1C

Data from a British registry of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) show decreased survival at low as well as high glycated hemoglobin (A1C) levels.

Background: Recent clinical trials have failed to demonstrate benefit with intensive glycemic control and raised concerns about the optimum target for A1C.

Methods: Investigators analyzed data from the following two cohorts of patients, aged at least 50 years with T2DM, who were identified from a British primary care database:

  • Cohort 1: Individuals (n = 27,965) whose treatment regimens had been intensified from oral monotherapy to combination therapy with oral glucose-lowering agents.
  • Cohort 2: Individuals (n = 20,005) whose treatment regimens had been intensified from oral therapy to combination regimens that included insulin.

Results:   

  • Mean and median follow-up in the two cohorts were, respectively, 4.5 years and 3.9 years (Cohort 1) and 5.2 years and 4.4 years (Cohort 2).
  • Unadjusted all-cause mortality rates in both cohorts were greatest in the lowest and highest deciles (Tables 1 and 2).
  • Adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause mortality by decile in Cohort 1 (with decile 4 [median A1C 7.5%] as reference) were:
    • Decile 1: 1.30 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.58, P = 0.0072)
    • Decile 10: 1.93 (95% CI 1.55-2.42, P < 0.0001)
  • Corresponding hazard ratios for Cohort 2 were:
    • Decile 1: 1.79 (95% CI 1.45-2.22, P < 0.0001)
    • Decile 10: 1.80 (95% CI 1.49-2.17, P < 0.0001)

Table 1. A1C values and survival in Cohort 1

 

A1C decile

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

n

3513

3501

3374

3136

2884

2684

2437

2334

2133

1969

A1C*, %

6.42

6.94

7.27

7.54

7.82

8.11

8.44

8.85

9.41

10.47

All-cause mortality, n (%)

301
(9)

238
(7)

231
(7)

207
(7)

190
(7)

179
(7)

175
(7)

168
(7)

161
(8)

185
(9)

*Mean of values recorded between first prescription of intensified therapy and outcome event


Table 2. A1C values and survival in Cohort 2

 

A1C decile

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

n

1289

1291

1424

1661

1878

2148

2354

2463

2660

2837

A1C*, %

6.38

6.95

7.28

7.55

7.83

8.11

8.45

8.87

9.42

10.56

All-cause mortality, n (%)

232
(18)

204 (16)

209 (15)

192 (12)

211 (11)

271 (13)

305 (13)

334 (14)

404 (15)

472 (17)

*Mean of values recorded between first prescription of intensified therapy and outcome event

Conclusions: Regardless of glucose-lowering treatment regimen, an A1C of approximately 7.5% was associated with lowest mortality.     

Comment:  "Our findings suggest that diabetes guidelines might need revision to include a definition of an HbA1C [A1C] minimum value," write the authors.

 
Lancet. 2010; 375: 481-489
Currie CJ, Peters JR, Tynan A, Evan M, Heine RJ, Bracco OL, et al.
 
Also see: Macro- and Microvascular Effects of Hyperglycemia: Addressing Issues and Controversies

Home | Literature Update | Journal Link | Resources | Meeting Highlights | Members | About VBWG | Web Links
 
Contact us at: info@vbwg.org
 
Privacy Policy
 
© 1999-2010 Medtelligence, LLC