Resources


Advanced




 Quick Order
  This area of the site
   requires the
  Acrobat Reader
  and the ability to
  view zipped files.
  Click below to
  download the
   necessary
   software.
  The StuffIt
   software can be
   used for either
   Windows or
   Macintosh.


Download the Adobe Acrobat reader

Download the StuffIt Expander

Download WinZip

 
 
Slide Lecture Programs
2006 Core Curriculum
Targeting Insulin Resistance for Vascular Protection
July 31, 2006


III: Clinical Imperatives When Treating Patients with Diabetes

  • This study compared the effect of rosiglitazone vs glyburide on glycemic control in 203 patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients ranged in age from 40 to 77 years; mean diabetes duration at baseline was 6.2 years in the glyburide group and 5.3 years in the rosiglitazone group.

  • After a 2-week screening period and a 4-week run-in period, patients were randomized to rosiglitazone 8 mg daily (n = 104) or glyburide (titrated to achieve optimal glycemic control for the first 8 weeks and then held constant, mean dose 10.5 mg/day; n = 99). The treatment period was 52 weeks.

  • Both treatments achieved significant reductions in A1C and FPG at week 52. However, the pattern of glycemic decreases differed: Glyburide treatment resulted in an initially rapid reduction in A1C from week 0 through 16, after which glycemic control progressively deteriorated. In contrast, the progressive reductions in A1C were sustained with rosiglitazone.

  • At week 52, 28% of patients in the rosiglitazone group achieved an A1C of <7% vs 13% in the glyburide group.

  • In rosiglitazone-treated patients, mean FPG decreased rapidly between weeks 0 and 8, and continued to decrease to week 52. In the glyburide-treated patients, FPG decreased more dramatically between weeks 0 and 8, remained stable to week 16, and gradually increased through week 52.


Home | Literature Update | Journal Link | Resources | Meeting Highlights | Members | About VBWG | Web Links